Task. You are required to write and submit a 1.500/2.000 word report demonstrating your critical knowledge about yourself (skills, goals, values,…) for developing your academic and professional career. The report is divided into three sections, which reflect the learning outcomes of the module, each section is highlighted below: 1. Section 1: Draw the mind map (and/or journaling) of the life they aspire, dream of, or expect to live (outcome 1) 2. Section 2: Do an analysis of your individual strengths and weaknesses to develop a successful academic and professional career as EU
PPD111 CRAFTING YOUR FUTURE Task brief & rubrics
Task. You are required to write and submit a 1.500/2.000 word report demonstrating your critical knowledge about yourself (skills, goals, values,…) for developing your academic and professional career. The report is divided into three sections, which reflect the learning outcomes of the module,
each section is highlighted below:
1. Section 1: Draw the mind map (and/or journaling) of the life they aspire, dream of, or expect to live (outcome 1)
2. Section 2: Do an analysis of your individual strengths and weaknesses to develop a successful academic and professional career as EU
student and future worker. (outcome 2)
3. Section 3: Propose 1 or 2 areas to improve during this course (in terms of the 7 skills proposed by CYF). (outcome 3)
Details of the task to do: individual task
proposal Structure: o Executive Summary (does not count to word count)
o Sections 1, 2 and 3
o General conclusions drawn
o References
o Appendix (if required)
the task will be submitted in a .pdf document, uploaded to Moodle course (via Turnitin). Use critical thinking skills to argue and justify your ideas and arguments. Also, you should to demonstrate that you have used references and materials
used in the course. You could add anymore reference or evidence that you think could be interesting for the final goal.
Formalities:
Wordcount: not more of 2000 words Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount. Font: Arial 12,5 pts. Text alignment: Justified. The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
Submission: Week 8 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Deadline: 18TH July 2021 (23:59 PM)
Weight: This task is a 100% of your total grade for this subject (fail/pass)
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69
Knowledge &
Understanding
(20%)
Student demonstrates
excellent understanding of
key concepts and uses
vocabulary in an entirely
appropriate manner.
Student demonstrates
good understanding of the
task and mentions some
relevant concepts and
demonstrates use of the
relevant vocabulary.
Student understands the
task and provides minimum
theory and/or some use of
vocabulary.
Student don’t understand the task and not answer the
question. Neither not
mention key concepts or uses
minimum amount of relevant
vocabulary.
Application (20%) Student applies fully
relevant knowledge from
the topics delivered in
class.
Student applies mostly
relevant knowledge from
the topics delivered in
class.
Student applies some
relevant knowledge from
the topics delivered in
class. Misunderstanding
may be evident.
Student applies little relevant
knowledge from the topics
delivered in class.
Misunderstands are evident.
Critical Thinking
(40%)
Student critically assesses
in excellent ways, drawing
outstanding conclusions
from relevant authors.
Student critically assesses
in good ways, drawing
conclusions from relevant
authors and references.
Student provides some
insights but stays on the
surface of the topic.
References may not be
relevant.
Student makes little or none
critical thinking insights, does
not quote appropriate
authors, and does not
provide valid sources.
Communication
(20%)
Student communicates
their ideas extremely
clearly and concisely,
respecting word count,
grammar and spellcheck
Student communicates
their ideas clearly and
concisely, respecting word
count, grammar and
spellcheck
Student communicates
their ideas with some
clarity and concision. It
may be slightly over or
under the wordcount limit.
Some misspelling errors
may be evident.
Student communicates their
ideas in a somewhat unclear
and unconcise way. Does not
reach or does exceed
wordcount excessively and
misspelling errors are
evident.
