I Think, Therefore I Kant. The work is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

I will pay for the following article I Think, Therefore I Kant. The work is to be 4 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. The essay “I Think, Therefore I Kant” overviews the philosophy works and the revolutionary thinking of Immanuel Kant at the turn of the 19th century and his philosophy of reason still resonates in the Western world. In his attempt to reconcile religion and science, he drew criticism from all sides. His works, often heavy and lengthy, have at times made Kant difficult to understand. Yet beneath the surface lies an eloquent approach to philosophy and morality. Whether being praised or criticized, he has been called the “finisher and conqueror of Illumination”. A close examination of Kant’s ethical theory reveals why it drew such controversy and why it continues to persist.

Kant’s individual uniqueness stems from his belief in what is called deontological ethics or the study of duty. According to Kant, an action’s moral value does not stem from the consequences of the action, but rather from the motivation behind the will to act. When the action is universal and is motivated by only good will, it is a categorical imperative. In Kant’s words, “Act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. Thus an action that is motivated by good will is universally good. Kant criticized the Utilitarian theories that evaluate the action based on the happiness it produced. According to Utilitarianism, whatever produces the most happiness in the most people is the moral course of action. This could lead to the happiness of many at the expense of a few people’s misery.