Develop a feasible research proposal

Develop a feasible research proposal

Purpose of Assignment: Develop a feasible research proposal

The purpose of this assignment is to introduce you to the final phase PET Process, translation of evidence, and also the dissemination of evidence. This assignment will help you determine after reviewing the evidence will the changes recommended by the evidence be feasible and appropriate to translate into the clinical setting. If so the next step would be the dissemination of this knowledge to others. The group presentation will provide you the opportunity to disseminate this evidence to the class and practice your professional presentation skills.

This assignment meets the course SLO’s

# 4. Use successful group and learning-team processes in developing a research proposal.

# 5. Develop a feasible research proposal.

# 6. Present a research proposal using written and verbal formats.

Tasks for the Assignment (This is a RECORDED GROUP Assignment)

1. Using the PowerPoint template found in the module the group will develop a presentation on their proposed mock research proposal.

2. The group will use information from the previous assignments to help complete the presentation.

3. Each group will provide the following information on the PowerPoint slides

a. What is the problem you want to solve

b. What is the group’s clinical practice question using the PICO format

c. Literature Search information

d. Level and quality of each research article (4 articles) one slide for each article

e. Synthesize the overall strength and quality of evidence (use SIDE, Synthesis Process, and Recommendations Tool, pp.303–305)

f. Identify recommendations for change based on the evidence synthesis

g. Are the recommendations feasible and appropriate to address the practice question? Explain the rationale for your assessment

4. Each member of the group must speak and record during this presentation.

5. This presentation summary will be submitted via Canvas on the day of the presentation. The team will deliver a 15-20 minute recorded presentation

6. Five points will be deducted if over 20 minutes.

Your group can pre-record your slides by embedding your voice into the PowerPoint slide it is easy to do by following the link below.
Or you can use zoom to record your presentation as well

Assignment 2

Critical appraisal | Reading homework help

There are five articles you can pick one from them.

and here are the requirements:

Students will be required to submit a 1,000-word critical appraisal of a research article from an academic journal. Students will be provided with a choice of articles to appraise, which will be posted on the course Moodle site.

The critical appraisal is designed to provide students with an opportunity to critically review the overall appropriateness of the research design underpinning a piece of social science research. This will involve assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the particular methodological approach adopted in the research and commenting on its suitability to address the research questions. Your appraisal should be specifically methodological in focus.

Here are few guiding questions to help you write and focus on reviewing:

• The research questions the author(s) set out to address. Are they concrete and appropriate?

• The combination of methods being employed. Are they appropriate and fully justified?

• To what extent are the methods chosen suitable to answer the research questions? Are they coherent and well-aligned?

• Did the authors describe their methods fully? What are some gaps you identified?

• What the data and evidence is. How were they collected/recorded/retrieved, analysed and interpreted? • The methodological and epistemological strengths/weaknesses of the research design. What ontological and epistemological assumptions are made by the author[s]?

• Ethical and/or political issues concerning the research. Are they apparent and being addressed by the author[s]?

Your review should be fully referenced drawing on relevant methodological literature. Further guidance on reading and the articles for appraisal will be provided.

Grading and feedback of the assessment will take into consideration the following:

• How well you have demonstrated an awareness of problems and shortcomings of the data and methods of analysis;

• Whether you have considered the extent to which the interpretation of the findings is consistent with the analysis and research design undertaken;

• How well structured are the ideas in the assignment and whether there is a logic to their development and argumentation;

• How reflexive (i.e. reflecting on your own position and assumptions as a student) are your comments on the research methods;

• How well the assignment is presented, including style of writing, grammar, structure, and referencing.