Identify a Major Breach Draft

Identify a major breach of a virtualized environment that has occurred in the recent past (within the last five years). For your Portfolio Project Assignment, you will write a critical evaluation of your chosen breach, and review and analyze the breach along the following dimensions:

1. What went wrong?
2. Why did it occur?
3. Who was responsible?
4. How could it have been prevented?
5. What advice would you offer to prevent such a breach from occurring in the future?

For the purposes of this assignment, you will write the draft for the Portfolio Project.  Your outline should meet the following requirements:

• Be approximately 4 pages in length, not including the cover page and reference page.
• Your outline should include an introduction, a body, and a conclusion.
• Cite a minimum of eight to 10 related sources—five of which should be academic peer-reviewed scholarly sources—to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook.r

Be clear and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

Assignment Instructions

• There are three questions listed below you must answer ONLY two. Each question is worth 5 points for 10 points total.
• Each question has a similar format: you’ll be presented with a scenario and you must
  1. Explain the relevant aspects of the philosophical theories in question.
     • This is similar to a philosophical exegesis.  Click HERE Actionsfor tips on how to do philosophical exegesis.
  2. Apply the philosophical theories to the scenario in question.
     • For example, you should explain what Mill’s theory would require Mrs. Smith’s lawyer to do with her will and, most importantly, why. Then do the same for Kant.
  3. Assess which philosophical theory offers the best moral guidance for how one should act in the scenario in question.
     • This should include an argument about why, for example, you maintain that Mill’s theory gives the best guidance to Mrs. Smith’s lawyer AND an argument about why, following the same example, you maintain Kant’s theory is inadequate.  You should also include a potential way to strengthen the inadequate theory.
• Although the assignment is like an essay, you DO NOT need an introduction or conclusion.  (Note that this is different than with your final essay answers, which do require introductions, thesis statements, and conclusions.)

Assignment Questions (remember, answer only two)

1. Consider the following scenario: A burning building, relatively structurally sound, is engulfed in flames, with 4 small children trapped inside. There are two people who must decide how to respond to the situation: Granny — an 80-year-old misanthropic, pyrophobic, Luddite, who saw her mother burn to death in a fire when she was younger. She’s in relatively good health, although she uses a cane. She has a cell phone for emergencies, but she hates it. Clark Kent — a 30 year, world-renowned firefighter who is on his way back from the latest firefighting championships. He has all his gear with him but, like Wolverine in the X-men, has loads of superpowers, so he rarely needs it.
   1. Explain, thoroughly, the relevant aspects of Aristotle’s and Mill’s theories. In other words, what would Aristotle and Mill think is (morally) at stake in this scenario?
   2. Explain how Granny and Clark Kent should both respond to the situation of the burning building from both Aristotle’s and Mill’s perspectives. Would Aristotle require both Granny and Clark Kent to do the same thing? Why or why not? Would Mill?
   3. Make an argument explaining which philosopher gives the better moral guidance and which gives the worst.  What’s something that you would change to ameliorate the “worse” theory? Be sure to thoroughly explain your assessments here.
2. Imagine you are Mrs. Smith’s lawyer, and you have promised to execute the terms of her will after she dies. Years ago she had you draw up a will leaving her substantial fortune to a famine relief fund. When she dies and you go through her papers, however, you find a more recent, legally binding will, written and signed by Mrs. Smith herself, in which she bequeaths all her money to her lazy niece, who (you know) will spend it on beer and Beanie Babies. No one else knows of the later will, but by law a later will supplant an earlier one.
   1. Explain, thoroughly, the relevant aspects of Kant’s and Mill’s theories. In other words, what would Kant and Mill think is (morally) at stake in this scenario?
   2. From Kant’s perspective: Should you execute the later will? Or should you secretly destroy it, act as if it never existed, and carry out the terms of the earlier one (giving the money to famine relief)? Why? From Mill’s perspective: Should you execute the later will? Or should you secretly destroy it, act as if it never existed, and carry out the terms of the earlier one (giving the money to famine relief)? Why?
   3. Make an argument explaining which philosopher gives the better moral guidance and which gives the worst. What’s something that you would change to ameliorate the “worse” theory? Be sure to thoroughly explain your assessments here.
3. Imagine that there’s a famous, rich celebutante whose Bentley is dangling precariously off the edge of a cliff.  Below, past a jagged craggy precipice, a school of hungry hammerhead sharks is circling.  The celebutante is frantically tweeting her plight to her millions of followers, promising a large reward to whoever can rescue her.  You decided to try your luck, even though you are afraid of sharks, cannot swim, and have no search-and-rescue abilities.
   1. Explain, thoroughly, the relevant aspects of Aristotle’s and Kant’s theories. In other words, what would Aristotle and Kant think is (morally) at stake in this scenario?
   2. From Aristotle’s perspective, what should you do and why?  From Kant’s perspective, what should you do and why?
   3. Make an argument explaining which philosopher gives the better moral guidance and which gives the worst. What’s something that you would change to ameliorate the “worse” theory? Be sure to thoroughly explain your assessments here.

• Words requirement: 500

Courses 1 : Information Governance

Course 2 : Data science and Big data analysis

It is important for students to understand how their curriculum is applied to real world workplace environments. How what you are studying can or will benefit you in your current, or future, career. For this assignment, you will need to review your program’s curriculum and goals and compare that to your current job/internship (if unemployed, reflect on a job/career that you desire to obtain in the future).

Assignment Details:Part 1 – Identify a Problem

• Problem solving starts by being able to identify existing problems, gaps in service, inefficient systems/processes, flawed policies, or any other areas of our job/career where improvement is needed. Identify a problem or gap at your workplace and explain why/how this problem exists.

Part 2 – Solve the Problem

• Use your knowledge that you’ve learned in the program (or hope to learn in a future course) to implement a plan to solve the problem.

Please include your Program  PHDIT in the reflection

syllabus :

Alves de Freitas, Andrade dos Reis, E., Senra Michel, W., Gronovicz, M. E., & de Macedo Rodrigues, M. A. (2013). Information Governance, Big Data and Data Quality. 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 1142–1143.Tallon, Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178.

Tallon. (2013). Corporate Governance of Big Data: Perspectives on Value, Risk, and Cost. Computer (Long Beach, Calif.), 46(6), 32–38.Turel, Liu, P., & Bart, C. (2017). Board-Level Information Technology Governance Effects on Organizational Performance: The Roles of Strategic Alignment and Authoritarian Governance Style. Information Systems Management, 34(2), 117–136.Simberkoff. (2016). 5 best practices for information governance and risk management. KM World, 25(8), S30–.

Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles 2017 ARMA International, www.arma.org/principles.MacLennan, Alan. (2017). Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy, pp.10 – 44. Facet Publishing.Hulme. (2012). Information Governance: Sharing the IBM approach. Business Information Review, 29(2), 99–104.New IGRM version recognizes value of privacy, security. (2013). The Information Management Journal, 47(1), 16–.Saffady. (2015). Records management or information governance? The Information Management Journal, 49(4), 38–.

Calderaro, & Craig, A. J. S. (2020). Transnational governance of cybersecurity: policy challenges and global inequalities in cyber capacity building. Third World Quarterly, 41(6), 917–938.Ali, Green, P., Robb, A., & Masli, A. (2022). Governing information technology (IT) investment: A contingency perspective on organization’s IT investment goals. Australian Journal of Management, 47(1), 3–23.DeNardis. (2017). Cybersecurity Governance. In The Global War for Internet Governance (pp. 86–106). Yale University Press.

Manning. (2020). “Rifled Precision”: Using E-discovery Technology to Streamline Books and Records Litigation. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 22(3), 663–.Ward, Purwin, C., Sipior, J. C., & Volonino, L. (2009). Recognizing the Impact of E-Discovery Amendments on Electronic Records Management. Information Systems Management, 26(4), 350–356.Vinjumur. (2018). Predictive Coding Techniques With Manual Review to Identify Privileged Documents in E-Discovery. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Vogel, & Rood, D. K. (2019). Dealing with subpoena requests for digital data. Journal of Accountancy, 227(3), 12–13.

Tallon, Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178.Brooks. (2019). Perspectives on the relationship between records management and information governance. Records Management Journal (London, England), 29(1/2), 5–17.Bhatia, Douglas, E. K., & Most, M. (2020). Blockchain and records management: disruptive force or new approach? Records Management Journal (London, England), 30(3), 277–286.

Borgman. (2018). Open Data, Grey Data, and Stewardship: Universities at the Privacy Frontier. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(2), 365–412.Henttonen. (2017). Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science, 17(3), 285–303.MacLennan, Alan. (2017). Information Governance and Assurance: Reducing Risk, Promoting Policy, pp. 113 – 123. Facet Publishing.Viktor Mayer-Schönberger. (2010). Beyond Privacy, Beyond Rights—Toward a “Systems” Theory of Information Governance. California Law Review, 98(6), 1853–1885.

Lappin, Jackson, T., Matthews, G., & Onojeharho, E. (2019). The defensible deletion of government email. Records Management Journal (London, England), 29(1/2), 42–56.Bojana, K. (2018). Why your information governance strategy must start with email. Jatheon.Gundling, M. (2019). What every company should know about email management for Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance.

Haynes. (2016). Social media, risk and information governance. Business Information Review, 33(2), 90–93.Olly Jackson. (2018). GDPR: companies at risk over unstructured data. International Financial Law Review.Madhava. (2011). 10 things to know about preserving social media. The Information Management Journal, 45(5), 33–.

Chhabra, & Bala, M. (2018). A Comparative Study of Data Deduplication Strategies. 2018 First International Conference on Secure Cyber Computing and Communication (ICSCCC), 68–72.Franks. (2015). New technologies, new challenges: Records retention in a cloud environment. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 39(2), 191–.Luciana Duranti & Corinne Rogers. (2019). Trusting Records in the Cloud: The Creation, Management, and Preservation of Trustworthy Digital Content , pp 119 – 131. Facet Publishing.