After reading each section, write down how you compare to the advice given by Putnam, Sungkhasettee, and Roediger (2016).
This exercise should get you to thinking about your study strategies and what is working and not working in comparison to suggestions from cognitive psychologist.
1. Read the article.
2. After reading each section, write down how you compare to the advice given by Putnam, Sungkhasettee, and Roediger (2016).
Examples of things to include would be: Do you already do the suggestion? If so does it work for you? How or why not? If you do not do the suggestion, why not and do you think you should consider it?
3. Use the subheading provided and include your response and information underneath ALL SECTIONS IN ARTICLE!!
Example:
Organize your time
Type out your information
Buy or rent your books before the course
Type out your information
Continue using ALL the other subheadings in the article.
Your answers should reflect that you read the article and thought about your own study techniques.
Attachment with article included at bottom!!Prior to beginning work on this discussion, please read both “Limitations to Evidence-Based Practice” and “Rationale and Standards of Evidence-Based Practice,”and listen to the Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part One. On the last day of Week 5, listen to Case Studies in Non-evidence Based Treatment Part Two. For your initial post, you will choose one of the case studies from this week’s audio file selection on which to base your remarks. Based on the available information, evaluate the symptoms and presenting problems for the patient in the chosen case study and propose a provisional diagnosis. Describe one evidence-based treatment for this diagnosis and provide a rationale for your choice. Research at least two peer-reviewed articles to support your evidence-based treatment selection.
