Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on aboriginal and settler relations in australia Paper must be at least 1750 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The government of Australia in 1991 began the process of reconciliation so as to progressively address the legacy of colonial injustice (Green, 2011: p34). However, the framing of policy to this end has been restrictive, while the lack of a political will has also hindered any progress in reconciliation and justice for indigenous aborigines. This has resulted in tensions between the national human rights regimes and internationally acknowledged standards of human rights.Short (2003: p292) argues that there were no formal settlement or treaty involved in the colonization of Australia with the colonizers arguing that the Australian Aborigines could not sign any settlement because Australia was not occupied prior to its colonization, which has meant that Australia’s indigenous people have been subjected racism and injustice.

Despite the Council of Aboriginal Reconciliation Act of 1991 that was meant to kick-start the process of reconciliation between Australian society and the indigenous Aborigines of Australia after centuries of dispossession and dispersion of the latter, there was no provision for justice for the Aborigines. This had the effect of limiting the aspirations of the indigenous Aborigines. Therefore, Short (2003: p293) claims that the Act does not seek to atone for the injustice suffered by the Aborigines and, in fact, attempt to pursue an agenda of assimilation as another phase in the process of total colonization of Australia.

As such, it is the writer’s belief that any attempt at reconciliation should seek to reflect the aspirations of the indigenous Aborigines more closely, specifically by addressing the issue of internal colonization.While the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation Act of 1991 officially seeks to enhance the relationship between Australia’s Aborigines and the former colonialists, while also enhancing understanding of the&nbsp.former’s history and culture and redress their social and political disadvantage (Short, 2003: p294), there is evidence that the Act ultimately bars any reconciliation between the two groups.&nbsp.

Need help with my writing homework on Following the American Psychological Guidelines. Write a 250 word paper answering;

Point Of View is the perspective of considering things, which demonstrates to us the attitude, or emotional state of anyone involved in the circumstance. In literature, point of view is defined as the method of recitation that is employed by an author in a bid to let the readers “hear” and “see” every described situation in a story, poem or essay. It is also a replication of the attitude bored by a person from real life or fiction.

There are different types of “views” that can be deduced from the author’s writing. They are the first-person point of view which is used to express a character’s feelings or attitude in a detailed manner, second-person point of view, which is used mainly to attract the reader’s attention from the beginning and third-person point of view which may be used to introduce a dual point of view from the author and characters of the piece.

The author of shame, Dick Gregory, employs the use of the first-person point of view.

This perspective is effective in creating an intimate relationship with the reader since all emotions and attitudes expressed in the narrative are from the author’s point of view. This technique is quite flexible and subjective because it allows the author to portray a stream of consciousness while conducting an interior monologue. However, this point of view is impaired because the opinions in the narrative are from a particular individual.

Compose a 500 words assignment on the tutankhamens curse. Needs to be plagiarism free!

HistoryTutankhamen’s CurseThe Tutankhamen’s curse is considered to be one of the most thrilling mysteries of the 20th century, and many people continue building up various hypotheses about it. This mystery gained such popularity among mystery lovers all over the world is a range of enigmatical deaths following the discovery of the pharaoh’s tomb in 1922. Over 20 people related in some way to the opening of Tutankhamen’s tomb in Luxor died under unclear circumstances during the next several years, and six of them died in London.

These were not only direct participants of the opening, but also their relatives. Moreover, one of the two leaders of the expedition, Lord George Carnarvon, died six weeks after the tomb’s disclosure. Fueled by numerous details, like the story about a canary and a cobra, and morbid imagination of journalists, the case gained a reputation of a mysterious tragedy, caused by the “Mummy’s Curse”, supernatural power of ancient Egyptians. Being adamant about the supernatural origins of the deaths, adherents of the curse created a legend that scares people even nowadays.

However, numerous scholars became interested in this case and started searching for rational explanation of the phenomenon. And here, too, various theories have emerged. One of the most likely theories suggested by many scientists as a result of scrutinous researches is that the key role in deaths was played by the environment of the burial chamber that actually affected health of those who entered the newly unlocked tomb. This theory originates in the first half of the 20th century when it was also supported by Sir Arthur Conan Dole who considered the fungi to have been put into the tomb deliberately to punish robbers.

In 1986, Dr. Caroline Stenger-Phillip suggested that it was an ancient mould existing in the tomb. Modern researches prove that there are indeed specimens of pathogenic moulds and bacteria that can cause allergic reactions varying from congestion to bleeding in lungs (Holloway, 2013). According to Jennifer Wegner, an Egyptologist from Philadelphia, food placed into the tombs intended for afterlife, could have attracted insects, moulds and bacteria. Thus, this theory considers bacteria to be the reason of diseases and deaths.

On the other hand, this theory has its flaws as if all entering the tomb were exposed to the deadly fungi, they probably would have died much sooner that many months and years later. The theory that appears to be more plausible was offered by Mark Nelson in 2002 and involves statistical methods as a basis for the explanation. According to the theory, average life expectancy of those members of the expedition who were exposed to the curse and those who were not differs little (Dunning, 2008). The conclusion made by Nelson in the outcome of the analysis stated: “There was no significant association between exposure to the mummy’s curse and survival and thus no evidence to support the existence of a mummy’s curse” (Nelson, 2002).

These scientific hypotheses appear to be rather plausible and explain the deaths of the archaeologists better than the legend about the curse developed by pop culture. First, if it was the curse, it is unclear why Howard Carter, the actual leader of the research group, happened to live till the respectable age of 64 and die in 1939 under no unnatural circumstances. This is the primary argument refuting the curse hypothesis, as the curse would have killed Carter then. Second, the average age of the research group members was 74 years, and this is quite enough to consider their deaths natural.

In fact, Carter who was virtually the youngest in the group died later than all of them. Of course, there are more theories seeking to explain the mystery – including also a hypothesis about Aleister Crowley’s role in the range of deaths – but these two seem to me to be the most likely. References:Dunning, Brian. (2008) “King Tut’s Curse!” Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., Retrieved October 15 from: http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4106Holloway, April. (2013) The Curse of Tutankhamen’s Tomb: A Scientific Explanation?

– Part 2, Ancient Origins. Retrieved October 15 from: http://www.ancient-origins.net/myths-legends/curse-tutankhamen-s-tomb-scientific-explanation-part-2-00747Nelson, M. “The Mummy’s Curse: Historical Cohort Study.” British Medical Journal. 21 Dec. 2002, Volume 325, Number 7378: 1482-1485.

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on financial resources management. When all information regarding the financial and functional activities is informed to the shareholders and stakeholders, no issues of corporate governance are generally seen (Attenhauser, 2008). Separation between the management and the ownership gives rise to the agency theory. The corporate governance codes are needed to realize whether the directors are on the right track for maximizing returns of the shareholders. They are also entrusted by the owners to ensure that the level of risk is maintained reasonably. this prevents the company from becoming too dominant.

Corporate governance should be elaborated as the best practice whereby a company is administered and controlled. This includes association between the various stakeholders of a company like, shareholders, management, employees, suppliers and regulators. The main goal of corporate governance is to deal with the issues that are related to accountability and duties of the company. These advocate certain guidelines assuring the shareholders that their rights are protected as well as provides with a message to the community that corporate social responsibility protects the environment in an effective manner (Mallin, 2011).

It is observed that corporate governance had evolved in United Kingdom (UK) slowly and had responded to external events, besides increasing the demand for accountability in the different sectors of the economy. There were various reports that were issued since 1992, which were nothing, but a result of the emergence of corporate governance in UK. It elaborated codes for the best practices, which constituted the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) Combined Code on Corporate Governance, 2003. The codes were amended in 2006 and 2008 and were subject to review in 2009 (BBC Business, 2007). In UK, corporate governance is regarded as principle-based or voluntary approach and not a mandatory one.