Hi, need to submit a 2000 words paper on the topic Why the Leader of the Future Must Be a Perpetual Learner. As different humans could only create a different working culture, the success rate will be minimal. And, if a common working culture, if correctly said, the perfect, feasible and winnable working culture is ‘operationalised’, throughout the organization, the organization will be a success story. And, the script for this success story can only be scripted, by an effective leader or manager. So, this paper as a form of literature Review will analyze how the organizational culture mainly ‘scripted’ or created by the leader or manager creates both opportunities and challenges

From time immemorial, the success or failure of an organization or any other human activity depends on the role, the leader or manager plays. If the leader or manager follows a set of traits he/ she can ‘sprinkle’ success in many lives, including the individuals in his/her organization. The managerial skills should be visible and should be put to effective use when the leader, as a ‘builder’ builds a group by following a certain organizational culture. A manager will normally take over or preside over or manage an existing organization. That is, the building or recruiting of the ‘group’ of individuals as well as the installation of infrastructure, set up etc, would have already taken place, with the manager only leading and managing the organization. This job of taking an existing set up and managing it brings in a set of challenges, which can be taken care of by formulating certain strategies or solutions based on a common and effective organizational culture.

One of the important first tasks of a leader in an organization (both in a new organization and in an existing organization) is the creation of a Culture. That is, the task of the leader is to create a working culture, embed the working culture in the working group and environment, sustain it and also rectify it when faults occur. According to Edgar Schein (2004, p.17), “The culture of a group can now be defined as a pattern of shared basic assumptions that was learned by a group as it solved its problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well enough to be considered valid, therefore, to be taught to new members as the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems”.

Hi, need to submit a 500 words paper on the topic How do Lolita and Humbert differ in their abilities to deal with the past What do these differences reveal about their characters. How do Lolita and Humbert differ in their abilities to deal with the past? What do these differences reveal about their characters?

It is important to mention that Nabokov’s novel “Lolita” is considered to be a unique and majestic example of literature. Nabokov creates an incredible story that experiences a huge critics and appreciation in different circles. Its central characters construct the story on their seduction and develop it on their unusual and disastrous passion. The matter is that Lolita’s and Humbert’s past experiences have a huge and significant influence on their behavior and tastes. This personalities have to deal with the subconscious responses from their past as these issues predetermine Lolita’s and Humbert’s present way of life. Still, each hero coexists with his/her addictions in a different way. That is preconceived by the special features of character of Lolita and Humbert that are going to be discussed.

Lolita is described as “the quintessence of the nymphet, discovered by total accident in an Eastern American small town” (Janeway, n.p). Her character correlates with the tempting and even devil images that have been found by Humbert. Still, she also can be an ordinary American girl that desires to be happy. Her ambiguous image seems to be interesting to the reader. Lolita’s traction to the adult men remains to be unusual and curious. Surpassingly, that is happened because of the example that her mother presets. The matter is that her father has been an old man that is much older than her mother. To such extent, small girl has seen an old man near her young mother since the early childhood. Lolita may subconsciously percept elder men as an objects of love and passion. Still, her passion has never obsessive and she always was willing to escape from the object of her delight. According to this, it is possible to argue that Lolita is unstable and fickle. This girl does not know exactly what she wants and how she desired to live.

On the other hand, Humbert’s passion has been stable and strong. The matter is that this man always has some gravity to the young and even small girls. Still, Lolita is considered to be special for him. “She had entered my world, umber and black Humberland, with rash curiosity” admits Humbert about this young lady (Nabokov, 152). This man cannot resist the temptation considering the passion and love to this girl. Humbert does not like his pedophile inclinations and make a try to change them, still he has been failed (Boyd, 313-314). His passion comes to him since early childhood and is connected with his child love Annabel. He has been able to find the features of his first love in Lolita and this tragic story does not live him his entire life. Such evidences claim about his devoted and sincere soul. Also, his character seems to be strong and courageous.

Taking all facts under consideration, it is possible to admit that bout characters are presented as interesting and unusual. Lolita and Humbert have their foibles and have been in need to deal with them. They made this story special and unique for the readers of different generations.

Reference List:

Boyd, Brian. “Stalking Nabokov”. USA: Columbia University Press, 2011. Print

Janeway, Elizabeth. “The Tragedy of Man Driven by Desire”. The New Yourk Times, August 17, 1958. Web. April 25, 2015. https://www.nytimes.com/books/97/03/02/lifetimes/nab-r-lolita.html

Nabokov, Vladimir. “Lolita”. UK: Penguin, 2012. Print.