“I don’t know what to do!” shouted the Operations Manager for Syntax, Inc., a national leader in digital sales and support for a variety of SaaS tools and products. “We’ve been developing new software and services as fast as we can, but customers keep telling us that they are leaving to go to our competitors because we don’t meet their needs anymore.”

Team Case Study Analysis – 2

MGT 550

 

“I don’t know what to do!” shouted the Operations Manager for Syntax, Inc., a national leader in digital sales and support for a variety of SaaS tools and products. “We’ve been developing new software and services as fast as we can, but customers keep telling us that they are leaving to go to our competitors because we don’t meet their needs anymore.”

 

The Director of Marketing joined in. “We have changed up our marketing message 6 times over the past 2 years trying to find the right way to connect to our clients. Nothing seems to be working.”

 

A frustrated HR Manager then shared, “Turnover is at an all-time high. Employees are getting frustrated with us. Even though our pay and benefits package appear to be competitive in the marketplace, we have a revolving door. We find them, recruit them, and then they leave.”

 

Similar complaints were heard around the room in the Executive Director’s meeting. The new CEO was listening closely. He had arrived only 1-month ago to the company. He was hired by the Board of Directors to “fix things.” Over the past 12 months, Syntax has seen progressively declining sales and even sharper declines in retained customers. Prior to that, sales, revenues, profits, and customer retention were flat for about 4 years – not positive, not negative. Just flat.

 

To pull the company out of its “slump” 2 years ago, the previous CEO had challenged each of his executives to come up with an idea to “revitalize the company”. Each manager did as he or she was expected – each one came up with an initiative to improve the company. Examples included:

 

  • Operations: An efficiency consultant was hired to evaluate how the company developed and delivered its services to customers. It made several recommendations, including the move to implement kaizen in the workplace. The consultant thought there were elements that can work to apply an “agile” model within Syntax.

 

  • HR: An employee survey was conducted which identified over 20 areas of concern by employees. The HR Manager has built these 20 concerns into his goals for the past 18 months and has implemented new programs, a new performance appraisal system, a new payroll system, a new training program, a new benefits program, and a new incentive program as a result.

 

  • Sales: Sales decided to move away from the traditional long-term relationship model, believing it followed too many traditions of the past. Instead, it focused on just in time delivery, heavy emphasis on cross-selling services with products, and applying steady pressure to sales consultants through goals and compensation incentives to hit new quotas.

 

After 2 years of changes from a lot of departments, with nothing to show for it except for a decline in sales and loss of customers, the Board felt it was time for a change at the top, resulting in the new CEO. Obviously, the previous solution was not working. With the new CEO in place…

 

  • What do you see as potential problem(s)?
  • Where do you start?
  • How can the new CEO address these issues and get the company back on track?

 

Consider the best way to begin the journey to organize the company’s leadership and evaluate solutions. Write a 750-1,000-word memo describing your recommended approach.

 

 

– What was the leader known for? What was their inspiration? What did they do that was different? How did their research/ theory effect leadership today? Can you give examples of their theory in use today?

– Introduction to the leader including their background. Explain their theory in your words.

– What was the leader known for? What was their inspiration? What did they do that was different? How did their research/ theory effect leadership today? Can you give examples of their theory in use today?

– Conclusion- does this theory make sense in today’s world? How will you use this leadership style to your benefit?

– References required

Should the Electoral College be abolished in favor of direct election? Why/Why not? How would winners and losers be affected if we selected presidents on the basis of popular vote totals? How would presidential campaigning change?

Should the Electoral College be abolished in favor of direct election? Why/Why not?

How would winners and losers be affected if we selected presidents on the basis of popular vote totals? How would presidential campaigning change?

Take a virtual trip to Metropolitan Museum Of Art in New York City!  For this assignment, your job is to navigate their site and search for an appropriate artifact from their collections (Ancient Egyptian).  Choose an item (or items if you want to explore more than one!), and write an essay about it.

Take a virtual trip to Metropolitan Museum Of Art in New York City!  For this assignment, your job is to navigate their site and search for an appropriate artifact from their collections (Ancient Egyptian).  Choose an item (or items if you want to explore more than one!), and write an essay about it.  Observe its traits, identify the origin, and interpret its execution and symbolism in regards to the time’s artistic tendencies and religious trends.  Illustrate your knowledge of the art by evaluating an artifact of your liking:

Please include a picture and citation of the piece you chose to write about. All papers should be 1 ½ – 2 pages (of text).

For your initial post, explain what you believe to be the most compelling, revealing, or problematic argument Jones makes in Chapter 4 and relate any particular examples, facts, or statistics that stood out to you.

READ THE BOOK <VIOLENT BORDERS> BY REECE JONES in chapter4

Instructions

Initial Post (at least150 words)

For your initial post, explain what you believe to be the most compelling, revealing, or problematic argument Jones makes in Chapter 4 and relate any particular examples, facts, or statistics that stood out to you. Explain your reasoning and explain how the content of your post relates or connects to one or more of the border issues discussed in the first three chapters of the book or any relevant research you find interesting or important to include. (Always cite your sources by indicating page numbers for any quotes you may have used from the book and linking in URLs to any research conducted. See helpful Canvas Guides below). 

Reply to Two Posts (50 WORD FOR EACH)

Respond to two of you peers’ posts by acknowledging the significance (and accuracy) of the information presented by your peers, and add on to their work by discussing how it connects to other arguments and/or other additional support from the chapter, other parts of the book, or your own research. If you have a different understanding of Jones’ argument or find any contradictory research, it is important to share this with your peers. (Use the toolbar to link in the URL to any source you use; you can also use the toolbar to embed any images or videos that you referenced. See Helpful Canvas Guides below).

  • attachment

    PEERPOSTW7DB2.docx

Paper between 13-15 pages about International Business Transaction

Paper between 13-15 pages about International Business Transaction

Introduction Canyon Buff Corp. has developed a new construction chemical that greatly improves the durability and weatherability of cement-based materials. After spending $500,000 on the research of the potential market for the new chemical

Case – Canyon Buff’s Chemical Equipment  This case is a simple capital budgeting exercise that should reinforce your understanding of the following topics:  • Incremental unlevered net income • Free cash flow • Sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis

Before solving this case, you must watch the video “Capital Budgeting in-class exercise solution” in the Lecture 6 folder, which provides the basis for this case. You need to finish both lectures 6 and 7 to be able to complete the case study.

Introduction Canyon Buff Corp. has developed a new construction chemical that greatly improves the durability and weatherability of cement-based materials. After spending $500,000 on the research of the potential market for the new chemical, Canyon Buff is considering a project that requires an initial investment of $9,000,000 in manufacturing equipment. • The equipment must be purchased before the chemical production can begin. For tax purposes, the equipment is subject to a 5-year straight-line depreciation schedule, with a projected zero salvage value. For simplicity, however, we will continue to assume that the asset can actually be used out into the indefinite future (i.e., the actual useful life is effectively infinite).

• Canyon Buff anticipates that the sales will be $30,000,000 in the first year (Year 1). They expect that sales will initially grow at an annual rate of 6% until the end of sixth year. After that, the sales will grow at the estimated 2% annual rate of inflation in perpetuity.

• The cost of goods sold is estimated to be 72% of sales.

• The accounting department also estimates that at introduction in Year 0, the new product’s required initial net working capital will be $6,000,000. In future years accounts receivable are expected to be 15% of the next year sales, inventory is expected to be 20% of the next year’s cost of goods sold and accounts payable are expected to be 15% of the next year’s cost of goods sold.

• The selling, general and administrative expense is estimated to be $6,000,000 per year, but $1 million of this amount is the overhead expense that will be incurred even if the project is not accepted.

• The market research to support the product was completed last month at a cost of $500,000 to be paid by the end of next year.

• The annual interest expense tied to the project is $1,000,000.

2

• Canyon Buff has a cost of capital of 20% and faces a marginal tax rate of 30% and an average tax rate is 20%.

Instructions

I posted an incomplete Excel template for your analysis. You need to figure out how to construct the pro forma income statements and calculate the incremental unlevered net income. You should include ONLY the factors that will affect your capital budgeting decision. Revise the template if necessary.

Note that your analysis should be set up so the assumptions that impact the cash flow estimates can be easily changed to identify the sensitivity of your calculations to these assumptions. Never hardcode in excel (see the pdf “Using Excel in Capital Budgeting” on blackboard).

There are three sheets in the template. Use the worksheet “NPV” for questions 1 to 4, and the other two sheets for questions 5 and 6.

Submit your Excel spreadsheet through the blackboard. Clearly show your work so that I can trace your numbers.

Questions

1.  Use Excel to construct six-year pro forma income statements and calculate the incremental unlevered net income for the first six years.

• When calculating incremental unlevered net income, should we include all the expenses mentioned in the case? If not, what expenses should we exclude and why? Clearly and concisely state your reasons in the cell E9 of the excel template. If you just forecast the unlevered net income but don’t given any explanations on why you exclude certain expenses, a penalty of 30 points will deducted from your grade for the case study.

2.  Calculate six-year projections for free cash flows. Remember to include cash flows from the income statement and depreciation, changes in net working capital, and capital expenditures or dispositions.

Hint: You need to calculate the level of net working capital (NWC) and change in NWC. Pay attention to the timing of NWC.

3.  Canyon Buff expects that free cash flow from Year 6 onwards will increase at a constant rate of 2%/year into the indefinite future. Calculate PV(terminal value that captures the value of future free cash flows in Year 6 and beyond). That is, calculate the terminal value first, then find its value in Year 0 (today).

3

Hint:  We went over this in Lecture Note 6, so let me briefly review the key points: a. Assuming the cash flows grow at a constant rate g after Year N+1, then     Year N TV = (Year N+1 CF)/(r−g)   (from growing perpetuity formula).  where r is discount rate For example, if {FCF6, FCF7, FCF8, …} is a growing perpetuity, then Year 5 TV = Year 6 FCF/(r-g). Similarly, if {FCF7, FCF8, FCF9, …} is a growing perpetuity, then Year 6 TV = Year 7 FCF/(r-g).

b. We should discount this Terminal Value back to Year 0.

4.  Determine the NPV of the project. Remember to net out any initial cash outflows.

5. Perform a sensitivity analysis by varying the four parameters as follows:

Parameter Initial Assumption Worst Case Best Case Sales in Year 1 $30,000  $27,000  $33,000  NPV    Sales Growth through Year 6 6% 0% 10% NPV      Cost of Goods Sold (% of Sales) 72% 77% 67% NPV      Cost of Capital 20% 23% 17% NPV

For example, vary the parameter “Sales in Year 1” from the worst case $27,000 to the best case $33,000, holding all the other parameters fixed (at the level of initial assumptions). Then fill in the highlighted blank boxes for NPV in Excel (the sheet “Sensitivity Analysis”)

Do the same thing for the other three parameters.

Suppose you are the financial manager, if you are asked to use limited resources to refine the assumption on ONLY ONE of the above four parameters, which one should you choose and why? Clearly state the reason. Write your answer in Excel.

6.  Perform a scenario analysis by simultaneously varying the two parameters below:

4

 

Sales Growth through Year 6

% Cost of  Goods Sold NPV Scenario 1 (Baseline) 5% 71%  Scenario 2 6% 72%  Scenario 3 8% 73%  Scenario 4 9% 74%

Which scenario generates the highest NPV? Write your answer in Excel.

Respond to listed statements in at least 300 words each statement . Do you agree or disagree with the statement.  Statement 1:       Intelligence-led policing focuses on applying research to target crimes and efficiently prevent and combat criminal activity.  

Respond to listed statements in at least 300 words each statement . Do you agree or disagree with the statement.

Statement 1:       Intelligence-led policing focuses on applying research to target crimes and efficiently prevent and combat criminal activity.

Statement 2:        The gap in understanding the findings in academic, peer-reviewed criminal justice research and practitioner policy development could be caused by lapses in communication between researchers and practitioners.

Select two types of secondary data in qualitative designs? Audiovisual data. Biographies. Interview. Participant observation.

  • Select two types of secondary data in qualitative designs?
  •  Audiovisual data.
  •  Biographies.
  •  Interview.
  •  Participant observation.

Labor unions are a point of contention in modern business ethics and economics. Supporters of labor unions argue that they protect workers from unfair and unsafe practices in the workplace, and provide workers with better wages and benefits.

Union Against:

Labor unions are a point of contention in modern business ethics and economics. Supporters of labor unions argue that they protect workers from unfair and unsafe practices in the workplace, and provide workers with better wages and benefits. Opponents of labor unions claim that unions increase the cost of doing business, thereby decreasing a business’s ability to hire new workers, increasing the costs of goods and services for consumers and decreasing the company’s total profits. Should it be a business’s responsibility to recognize employee unions?