In the patient with risk factors for CVD (I), how does exposure behavior such as smoking and physical inactivity (C) versus a patient with limited and unknown risk factors (I) contribute to CVD treatment (T) in two years’ time frame?

Using the following table—search the 5 databases based on your PICOT Question—under findings note the number of relevant articles found—you may not find something in every database. Under features discuss what you liked about that database. ON the discussion board summarize your search—attach your chart for those that would like to see your search. You may not find what you are looking for in every search—and that is OK—but you must search every database to see what may be out there.

My PICOT QUESTION:

(P) In the patient with risk factors for CVD (I), how does exposure behavior such as smoking and physical inactivity (C) versus a patient with limited and unknown risk factors (I) contribute to CVD treatment (T) in two years’ time frame?

1. With all the stories about millions and millions of bytes of personal data having been exposed, why is their still any faith at all in the Internet? 2. How has the term hacking changed meaning over the years?

Answer each these questions in a paragraph with at least five sentences: Include the question and number your responses accordingly. Provide a citation for each answer.

1. With all the stories about millions and millions of bytes of personal data having been exposed, why is their still any faith at all in the Internet?

2. How has the term hacking changed meaning over the years?

3. What is the most dangerous hacker tool?

4. From the news: How were NSA’s hacker tools  compromised?

5. What was the vulnerability in the Target Breach?

6. What do you think of hactivism?

7. How did Stuxnet work?

8. What was the Arpanet?

9. Deep brain stimulation is a treatment for Parkinson’s disease. Medical devices such as these are now becoming accessible through the web. Consider the dangers (threat surface)?

10. What is the Red Team?

We will be reviewing a “keeper study” this week—evaluate an article by working through the following 7 question Again, keeper studies can be identified using handy Rapid Critical Appraisal checklists consisting of a set of simple but important questions.

We will be reviewing a “keeper study” this week—evaluate an article by working through the following 7 question

Again, keeper studies can be identified using handy Rapid Critical Appraisal checklists consisting of a set of simple but important questions. Below are sample questions developed for use with quantitative studies that are applicable to most appraisal situations (it’s important to note that qualitative evidence, if it’s relevant to the clinical question, should not be dismissed):

  1. Why was the study done? Make sure the study is directly relevant to the clinical question.
  2. What is the sample size? Size can and should vary according to the nature of the study. Since determining a valid minimum sample size in a single study can be difficult, taking into account multiple studies is beneficial.The answer to this question alone should not remove a study from the appraisal process.
  3. Are instruments of the variables in the study clearly defined and reliable? Make sure the variables were consistently applied throughout the study and that they measured what the researchers said they were going to measure.
  4. How was the data analyzed?Make sure that any statistics are relevant to the clinical question.
  5. Were there any unusual events during the study? If the sample size changed, for example, determine whether that has ramifications if you wish to replicate the study.
  6. How do the results fit in with previous research in this area? Make sure the study builds on other studies of a similar nature.
  7. What are the implications of the research for clinical practice? Ask whether the study addresses a relevant and important clinical issue.

Why is it important for business strategy to drive organizational strategy and IS strategy? What might happen if the business strategy was not the driver?

Why is it important for business strategy to drive organizational strategy and IS strategy? What might happen if the business strategy was not the driver?

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:

  • Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
  • Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
  • Provide extensive additional information on the topic
  • Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
  • Share an applicable personal experience
  • Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA)
  • Make an argument concerning the topic.

At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.

See this week’s question below and please remember that as doctoral students, all responses should include professional sources. When appraising qualitative research, why is the concept of data saturation important?

See this week’s question below and please remember that as doctoral students, all responses should include professional sources. 

When appraising qualitative research, why is the concept of data saturation important?

Explain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidemiology article that discusses potential issues with bias as a limitation and discuss what could have been done to minimize the bias

Explain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidemiology article that discusses potential issues with bias as a limitation and discuss what could have been done to minimize the bias (exclude articles that combine multiple studies such as meta-analysis and systemic review articles). What are the implications of making inferences based on data with bias? Include a link to the article in your reference.

1.  Consider a higher education institution you have attended or are currently associated with. How would you classify it? 2.  What is their mission statement?

1.  Consider a higher education institution you have attended or are currently associated with. How would you classify it?

2.  What is their mission statement?

3.  How does this mission statement address the needs of its students, faculty, staff, alumni, and community? If it doesn’t, what revisions would you recommend?

The organization is Abercrombie and Fitch  Create a 10- to 12-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes and visuals on every slide that includes the following elements: An analysis of the organization’s current culture (e.g., beliefs, expectations, values, and norms). Address how managers influence the organizational culture.

The organization is Abercrombie and Fitch

Create a 10- to 12-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes and visuals on every slide that includes the following elements:

  • An analysis of the organization’s current culture (e.g., beliefs, expectations, values, and norms). Address how managers influence the organizational culture.
  • An evaluation of the impact of demographic forces (e.g., age, gender, ethnic origin, race, sexual orientation, and social class) of your selected organization and what it could be
  • An examination of the impact of technological forces (e.g., changes in the technology managers use to design, produce, or distribute goods and services) of your selected company
  • Consider how this can contribute to innovation within the industry.
  • An examination on how the organization has complied with ethics and social responsibility behavior
  • Recommendations of ways to innovate based on your analysis
  • Summary
  • References

Please summarize, in your own words, a description of enterprise risk management. Why do you feel ERM is different from traditional risk management?

400 words

After reading below two articles and any other relevant research you locate, please discuss the following:

Please summarize, in your own words, a description of enterprise risk management. Why do you feel ERM is different from traditional risk management?

Readings:

Requirements:

  • Provide extensive additional information on the topic
  • Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
  • Share an applicable personal experience
  • Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)

Define (in your own words) the following terms: experimental group, control group, independent variable, and dependent variable.

https://openstax.org/books/psychology/pages/2-introduction

Make sure you have thoroughly read and reviewed the Chapter 2 text and powerpoint.

Instructions

Part 1: Initial Post

Write one paragraph of 5-7 sentences on each of the three topics below. This is a total of three paragraphs. You should use this three paragraph format for all discussion boards.

  1. Define (in your own words) the following terms: experimental group, control group, independent variable, and dependent variable.
  2. True random sampling can be difficult to obtain. Explain the following concepts: population, random sample, representative group, random assignment. Explore the idea of using the popular convenient sample of students enrolled in an Introduction to Psychology course. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of sample?
  3. Propose a simple approach to studying a psychological issue you are interested in. Make sure to include the independent variable, dependent variable, and sample.

Part 2: 

https://openstax.org/books/psychology/pages/1-1-what-is-psychology

1.Which two early fields led to the formation of the field of psychology? After identifying those two fields, describe the study of each field and give a real-world example of something that could be studied by each of the two.

2.Explain the two first theories of psychology (structuralism and functionalism). Be sure to include the focus of study and the methods of each theory. 

3.Explain the theory of behaviorism. How was behaviorism different from previous psychological theories? What were the behaviorists studying and how did they study it? Give a real-world example of something that could be understood using behaviorist theory.