Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on why international students pay more than home students. They contribute to the economy and their taxes support the educational institutions, and so, they are given some laxity in the fee. Actually, they are not given leniency but the international students are charged more fee which gives the impression that the home students are being charged less. This is the main reason why international students are charged more fees.

Interviewee: Yes, I do believe that when international students are charged more, they are being discriminated against home students. Even if the officials discard this aspect, yet it implicitly expresses itself. Discrimination gets expressed in a lot of forms, either intentionally or unintentionally. This discrimination, which is unintentional, roots itself deeply in the lives of international students. When they feel that they have to pay more fees, they feel procedural injustice. They feel that they are not being treated fairly. It is very important for the concerned educational officials to take measures to eliminate this type of discriminatory behavior, to make the students focus on their studies rather than making them feel dejected. These students should be ensured that they are not aliens and that they are welcome to enjoy the same kinds of rights as home students.

Interviewee: As I already mentioned, the feeling of discrimination is the biggest problem. There are also many other hazards. For example, international students already suffer from the burden of expenditure in the foreign country. They have to look for residence if they do not opt to live in hostels. They have to arrange for their food and clothing. There are a lot of other expenditures that they have to face. They are already under such big financial pressure. Arranging for fee that is more than what is charged from home students gives them a lot of financial burden. This takes a toll on their concentration on academics as well.

Compose a 500 words assignment on hudson v. michigan. Needs to be plagiarism free! Opinion on Hudson v. Michigan case I fully consent with the opinion of the court about the Hudson v. Michigan case that was declared on 15 June 2006.In order to decide whether or not Hudson should have been granted the suppression of evidence found by Officer Jamal Good because of lack of wait for a reasonable time before entering Hudson’s place and the consequent violation the known-and-announce rule on the part of the police, it is imperative the fundamental reasons for which the knock-and-announce rule was made are taken into consideration. The knock-and-announce rule was made to provide the police officers with protection from the retaliation of the surprised residents as they might retaliate in self-defense, to provide the private property with protection from harm, and to safeguard the dignity and privacy of the residents. Considering the details of the Hudson v. Michigan case, it becomes obvious that the police officers did not face retaliation from the residents. They neither damaged any private property of the residents nor harmed the dignity of the residents and particularly Hudson. Although his privacy might be considered intruded into, yet this is balanced out by the fact that Officer Jamal Good did wait for three to five seconds before entering Hudson’s home, which can be considered a reasonable time considering the fact that the investigation was made fundamentally to find drugs and firearms that could have easily been hidden had the police waited any longer. Besides, the knock-and-announce rule was never employed to protect the personal interest of a resident in hiding the evidence needed by a warrant from the government. If Hudson was granted his appeal, the negative effects of the decision would have far outweighed the positive outcomes and the decision would have led to increased and unreasonable freedom of the convicts in the future cases as well.

The criminal procedure in the US is derived from a range of legal sources that include but are not limited to the US Constitution’s baseline protections, state statutes, federal statutes, state and federal rules regarding the criminal procedure, and the federal and state case laws. The criminal procedure in the US has a very rational process of presentation of evidence in which the case is first presented by the prosecution in which the prosecution summarizes its arguments through an opening statement. The defense in turn might wait for the prosecution to complete its presentation of the case completely or might give its opening statement. The prosecution calls upon the witnesses to provide physical evidence of the guilty of the defendant. The defense addresses the court after completion of the prosecution. Another strength of the criminal procedure in the US is that the burden of proof resents upon the shoulders of the prosecution. The defense needs to prove that the crime was not possibly committed by the defendant given the proof of the prosecution might be unreasonable. After completion of the presentation of cases of prosecution and defense, the case is delivered to the jury that takes the decision in light of the laws.

Complete 7 pages APA formatted article: Strengths and Weaknesses of Benthams Utilitarianism. Ethics or moral philosophies come in many different forms, each of which seeks to take a unique dimension of human interactivity and conduct. One of these is utilitarianism, championed by philosophers such as Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism generally argues that the best course of action is one that maximizes utility by taking full advantage of benefits and reducing suffering (von Kutschera, 1999). Based on the moral and ethical arguments behind Bentham’s utilitarianism, many studies have come to critic the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism.

As far as the socio-ethical perspective of Bentham’s utilitarianism is concerned, it is very useful in the promotion of majority benefit, based on which an egalitarian basis is promoted. By saying utilitarianism promotes majority benefit, reference is being made to the fact that it upholds and encourages pleasure for as many people as possible (Scanlon, 1998). By implication, the theory elaborates ethics as a social responsibility that must be implemented from one person to the other and for the collective good of a majority of people. The reason this is so is that under an egalitarian basis, all humans are seen as equal and thus, equally justified to enjoy pleasure. It is for this reason that von Kutschera (1999) explained Bentham’s utilitarianism as a universal ethical hedonism that sees pleasure from a spiral approach. The spiral nature of pleasure means the individual must first be self-satisfied but whiles&nbsp.doing this must also consider the expansion of pleasure to the larger society. The majority benefit doctrine of Bentham’s utilitarianism and the fact that it has an egalitarian basis, thus, helps to create a universally desired state where the majority of people are happy (Mill, 1998). A typical example of this can be seen in utilitarian bioethics wherein a state of limited resources, nurses are first expected to give care to patients whose future productive value and happiness are quantified as higher (Birnbacher, 2003).

Halevy (1966) championed the need for ethical theories and philosophies to directly address and help solve problems with society, and this is exactly what Bentham’s utilitarianism seeks to do.

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Should Scotland Be Independent. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Division in the leadership of the Scottish people became a disaster following the adversity between Queen Mary and King James both of whom had followers. In effect, Scotland would merge with Great Britain. Campaigns about this treaty received divided reactions with a number of pro-unionists supporting it while the anti-unionists expressed their displeasure about it. The supporters were pleased that England and Scotland that had initially been querulous would unite forging a way for peaceful co-existence (Hawkins, 2012). However, there have been numerous campaigns for Scotland’s independence in the present day.&nbsp.

For years, Scotland lacked permission to access the British colonies for purposes of trade following the Navigation Act. The union with England would permit access to the British Colonies and hence boost the then weak Scottish economy (Kerevan & Cochrane, 2014). In an argument, Scotland would receive protection from Great Britain. Following the historic civil discord in Scotland, many people dwelt in abject poverty. The state of insecurity had continued to increase over the years resulting in the oppression of the Scottish people. Unionism was a potential solution to these problems.

However, those opposed to this union expressed their feeling that Scotland would turn into a province of England. For them, the union meant that England would dominate the economic, political, and religious fronts. On the economic front, an increased burden of taxation, English domination of trade, and the ruin of the Scottish manufacturing industry were anticipated (McCracken-Flesher, 2008). The adoption of the English currency and the flocking of English goods in Scotland markets ranked as potential economic threats. The advantages of the Union Treaty between Scotland and England overweighed the disadvantages leading to its adoption. This historical view presents room for argument on the need for Scotland’s independence (McCrone & Linklater, 2013).&nbsp.

Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on response and mitigation for us gulf coast hurricane disaster Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! The agency also manages funds coming from President’s Disaster Relief Fund and disaster aid programs from other federal agencies participating in the process. The agency also keeps the White House up to date with the recovery procedures of the disaster and makes necessary recommendations. Moreover, after the occurrence of US Gulf Coast hurricane, FEMA is supposed to notify all the victims about the aid programs to help them replace their properties if their applications are approved. The agency helps to provide funds for damage mitigation procedures such as replacing the damaged structures (Fema.gov).

National Guard is charged with both state and federal duties, responsibilities and actions during a national disaster. The agency is charged with planning, preparation, and response during the hurricane. The members have been trained to deal with an emergency medical response for the victims in need of immediate medical attention. It is also the duty of National Guard to organize search and rescue plan and utilize the communication plan in the response plan. Moreover, National Guard takes necessary actions within the limits of engineering, chemical, biological and radiological sector to counter any contamination that may occur as a result of the adverse damage by the hurricane. The federal agency is trained to contain any nuclear incidence that may arise in because of strong hurricane waves (Fema.gov)

A mitigation plan would help in reducing or lessen the extent of losses caused by the hurricane to the victims who do not have food and medical attention (Luther, 2008). The damage prevention and thorough insurance plans should suffice to the help the victims recover the losses. The mitigation plan would entail.

The risk assessment that entails identifying the hazards posed by the hurricane, previous and present occurrences and extent of damage and&nbsp.identifying the vulnerable populations that need urgent food and medical attention.