The heat stress uses the terms O, M, R, C, and E. Compare and contreast the Terms. Provide an exmple of a control method that you believe would be effective in controlling heat stress related to eaxch of the terms.

Letter of Transmittal

Write two different letters of transmittal that can be used in your Formal Proposal in Unit VIII. Pick two separate problems in your community, and imagine that your business is well positioned to provide a solution to that issue.

For example:

The School Board of Smoke River Valley, North Carolina, is concerned that its students are not receiving enough tutoring to ensure their place as a top school in the nation. My tutoring firm will draw from the local University to provide any child that wishes the opportunity a chance for one-on-one instruction with a college tutor.

Researching the issue and addressing specific problems will enhance your work. Be sure to follow the guidelines for a letter of transmittal found in your textbook.

Each letter should be at least one page long and address all the primary concerns issued in the text. Submit both letters in one document.

For this second mini-conference assignment, you should read the sample labs below. As in the first mini-conference, these were created by “imaginary” students for you to practice critiquing, and they have deliberate errors in them (therefore, you need to actively look for them, just as peer reviews in the real science world do). You will submit your critiques to me in the assignments area. After you’ve had the practice doing this and getting my feedback, for the third mini-conference, you and your classmates will be critiquing each others’ Phase V lab work that you’ll post in the forum. Then, for the final symposium poster project, you will also critique one another’s work.

Answer the following questions about the labs you read. Please keep your comments to constructive criticism (in other words, offer feedback, but be polite). For each question, answer “Yes,” “No,” or “Maybe,” and provide detail. Detail doesn’t just mean a full sentence like “Yes, enough evidence has been collected”. Your answers must make it clear that you have read and thought about the reports. These answers do not need to be long, but remember that you’re learning to provide feedback that will help your classmates to improve their work in future labs, so be as detailed as you can. Upload this assignment to the Assignments area of the classroom.

1) Is the step-by-step procedure sufficient to yield the necessary evidence needed to fully answer the listed research question? Think about whether you would be able to follow the procedure to get evidence that can answer the question.

2) Has enough evidence been collected for this specific research question?

3) Have they claimed more than the evidence supports? This is a very important question to ask when reading about scientific studies (or perhaps not-so-scientific studies) in the news.

4) Have assumptions impacted their results? Think about lab 1. We made the assumption that the galaxies that appear in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field are all the same size, so the ones that are larger are closer to us, and the smaller ones are farther away. If the conclusion involves distance, then the researcher needs to acknowledge that that assumption about size was made.

5) Does the claim directly answer the original research question? The conclusion should completely answer the question and not go beyond the original question.

6) Precisely what should the researchers have done or reported differently to improve their inquiry research project?

Identfy a business or personal dispute with which you are familiar. Provide some brief explainations of what happen. then discuss what legal issues were presented and how they were resolved. I dentify the stakeholder in the dispute and discuss possible ADR options thast might be a  better approach for the stakeholder to pursue that traditional ligation’