Motion and Forces Test

EQUATIONS:

        d                           v

v = —–                  a = —-                  Î”v = vf – vi                  p = m  x  v

        t                            t

 

F = m  x  a                  g = 9.8 m/s2                  Weight = m  x  g

assignment 08

Can you u have it done by tomorrow

I

Just for Maverick Minds

Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you discuss causes of psychopathology.

Address the following:

  • Provide a brief overview of how culture is a factor determining the expression of psychopathology.
  • Examine causes of psychopathology by using either the biopsychosocial or the diathesis-stress models.
  • Explain the changes in society’s perception of psychopathology as a function of historical time period.

Cite at least two peer-reviewed sources.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Operations Management IP4, 1250-1500 words, APA Format, At least 3 references

At times, a project manager must evaluate proposals from identified vendors and make decisions based on the project budget and schedule. It is essential to determine how the organization will determine the best response to the proposal’s individual vendors?

 

IRTC has asked you to evaluate the customer service add-on the vendor offered while still in negotiations for this project. The add-on will cost $25,000 and take an additional 4 weeks to install. Your manager has asked for your opinion. The project is tracking along according to schedule and budget.

 

What do you need to consider before saying yes or no? Prepare a memo for your manager outlining how either decision would affect the project and factors that need to be discussed and agreed to by various stakeholders involved in the project.

 

Assignment Guidelines:

 

In 1,250–1,500 words, address the following:

What do you need to consider before accepting or denying the vendor proposal? Explain.

How would your decision affect the overall project?

Consider budget, schedule, and resources.

What stakeholders would need to be involved in this decision-making process? Why?

 

What important factors would need to be discussed and agreed upon by the various stakeholders involved in the project? Explain.

need help with papeer

Assignment 2: Adjustment Case Study

Due in Week 8 and worth 230 points

Go to NPR’s StoryCorps Website, located at http://www.npr.org/series/4516989/storycorps. Read two (2) articles that were published within the last two (2) months that focus on individuals with major adjustment issues.  

Next, use the textbook and the Strayer Library to research evidence-based strategies to help with adjustment. Consider strategies that relate to stress and coping, gender, stages of life, cultural and social issues, and health.

When referencing the selected stories, please use this format:

  • Standard Reference Format:
    • Title of the story [Audio file]. (Year, Month Day). Retrieved from website url.
      • Example:

A homeless teen finds solace in a teacher and a recording [Audio file]. (2014, March 7). Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/03/07/286921391/a-homeless-teen-finds-solace-in-a-teacher-and-a-recording.  

  • In-Text Citation Format:
    • The in-text citation for a selected story is an abbreviated version of the title and the year of publication. The abbreviation contains the first three words of the title.
      • Example:

(“A homeless teen,” 2014).

When referencing the textbook, please use this format:

  • Standard Textbook Reference Format:
    • Author’s Name. (Date of publication). Title of the resource. Publisher information.
      • Example:

Santrock, J. (2006). Human adjustment: 2007 custom edition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

  • In-Text Citation Format:
    • The in-text citation for the textbook is the author’s last name and year of publication.
      • Example:

(Santrock, 2006). 

Write a three to six (3-6) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize two (2) articles you selected from the NPR Website. The two (2) article must be from within the last two (2) months.
  2. Describe the major adjustment issues discussed in each story.
  3. Examine at least three (3) evidence-based strategies from each of the selected articles that could help the individuals in each article enhance their adjustment skills.
  4. For each article, recommend the evidence-based strategy that is best suited for the people in the selected articles. Provide a rationale for your response.
  5. Use at least four (4) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources. Each of your selected articles (2) is a source and your textbook should be used as a source. One additional academic source is required for a total of four (4) sources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required assignment page length.
  • Include a reference page containing APA-formatted references for all sources used in your paper. The reference page is not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Identify contextual variables (e.g., culture) that impact psychological adjustment.
  • Define stress, stressors, and coping strategies, and contemplate their relationship to health and wellness.
  • Identify and describe social psychological phenomena.
  • Describe adult relationships, lifestyles, and issues of parenting and longevity.
  • Identify gender differences and explore gender role stereotypes.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in psychology.
  • Write clearly and concisely about psychology using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

MLA English Quizzes

Please Check the file, Make sure you will do them Corrcetly, If you did too much wrong, I will dispute to get my money back. Thank you for the understanding! The quartily its important. 

Saturday !!!

Sentencing

In this assignment, you will consider two hypothetical criminal cases for sentencing. Then, you will write a paper explaining the sentences you would give and your reasons for doing so. You will also consider the value of the alternative sentencing practices. Please consider both of the following scenarios as you complete this assignment.

    • Scenario A: Defendant A has been caught dealing marijuana out of her home. It is her second offense; she has already served time. She is the single parent of two small children and has a history of spousal abuse.
    • Scenario B: Defendant B was driving drunk and caused a car crash. The two victims in the other car were significantly injured but survived. Defendant B has expressed remorse. This is his first offense, and his blood alcohol was close to the legal limit.

Write a paper in which you address the following components:

    • Describe the possible traditional and alternative sentences you could give in each case.
    • Select the sentence you would assign to each criminal.
    • Explain why you would give the selected sentences. Discuss the value of the sentence.
    • You should write 1.5 pages in response to EACH scenario (3 pages total).

federal reserve presentation

 

Your boss has chosen you to give a presentation to a number of foreign officials regarding the United States Federal Reserve System. These officials are very interested in doing business in the United States, but they would like to learn more about the Federal Reserve and how it operates.

 

 

 

Develop a 10- to 15-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation.

 

 

 

 

 

Address the following questions and include a notes page which contains the write-up portion to each question:

 

 

 

  • What are the factors that would influence the Federal Reserve in adjusting the discount rate?

  • How does the discount rate affect the decisions of banks in setting their specific interest rates?

  • How does monetary policy aim to avoid inflation?

  • How does monetary policy control the money supply?

  • How does a stimulus program (through the money multiplier) affect the money supply?

Currently, what indictors are evident that there is too much or too little money within the economy? How is monetary policy aiming to adjust this?

Ambiguous Constitutional Language & Judicial Philosophy and Establishment of Rights

Ambiguous Constitutional Language

The First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments imply the right to privacy through the freedom of religion and the protections against mandatory housing of soldiers, unlawful searches and seizures, and self-incrimination. However, nowhere in the Constitution does the word “privacy” exist. Since the language of the Constitution related to the privacy rights and other rights—such as the right to bear arms—often is ambiguous, it leads to one of the most fundamental tenets of democracy: discourse. This ambiguity leaves room for interpretation and according to some legal scholars gives way to the belief that the Constitution is a living document that reshapes itself to suit the changing times. While Supreme Court Justices have the power to decipher and give meaning to the ambiguous language, the implications on policy can be both positive and negative.

To prepare for this Discussion:

 

  • Review the article “Disentangling the Fourth Amendment and the Self-Incrimination Clause.” Consider how the courts’ interpretation of the ambiguous overlapping of the Fourth Amendment and the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment influences policymaking.
  • Review the U.S. Supreme Court Cases District of Columbia v. Heller and Grutter v. Bollinger in the LexisNexis Academic database. Consider the impact of the Court’s constitutional interpretation in these cases.
  • Reflect on the strengths and limitations of the Supreme Court making policy by interpreting ambiguous constitutional language.

 

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 3 at least two strengths and two limitations related to the Supreme Court making policy by interpreting ambiguous constitutional language. Be specific and justify your response.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
Judicial Philosophy and Establishment of Rights

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson defined inalienable rights as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Although this statement is very vague and unclear as to what liberty and the pursuit of happiness entail, it provides rights to all citizens of the United States. Ambiguous language is used throughout the Constitution, which makes its interpretation a daunting task for Supreme Court Justices ruling on controversial cases.

There are two schools of thought for interpreting the U.S. Constitution: Originalism and Living Document Philosophy. Justice Antonin Scalia favors Originalism, which means the Constitution’s interpretation should pertain to the original intent of the document. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg favors Living Document Philosophy, which leaves the interpretation up to the changing moral, political, and cultural climate of the times.

Out of respect for the legacy of the founding fathers and the central identity of U.S. democracy, the Constitution will never undergo revision, but rather, can be amended. Originalists do not want an amendment to detract from the genuine Constitutional document. Conversely, Living Document Philosophy sees amendments as the Constitution’s intended legacy.

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review the U.S. Supreme Court cases Atkins v. Virginia and Grutter v. Bollinger in the LexisNexis Academic database. Think about the majority and dissenting opinions in each of these cases. Reflect on whether the justices used Originalism or Living Document philosophical interpretations to make their decisions.
  • Consider the strengths and limitations of Originalism and Living Document Philosophy as they relate to law and public policy.
  • Select one of the court cases in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Reflect on the Court’s final decision and how the justices interpreted the Constitution, resulting in the establishment of a “right.”

 

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 4 an explanation of which judicial philosophy for constitutional interpretation (Originalism or Living Document) you believe would best benefit law and public policy. Then describe a “right” which the Supreme Court established by interpreting the Constitution. Explain the constitutional interpretation that led to the establishment of this right.

Note: Put the judicial philosophy you selected in the first line of you post. You will be asked to respond to a colleague who selected a judicial philosophy that you did not.