1. Consider “The Stanford Prison Experiment.” Do you think the participants in this study sufferered harm? If so, what kind? What do you think the findings of the study were? Did the worth of the findings justify how participants were treated? Why or why not?
I need support with this Health & Medical question so I can learn better.
Before participating in this Discussion Forum, watch Module 5’s assigned videos.
1. Consider “The Stanford Prison Experiment.” Do you think the participants in this study sufferered harm? If so, what kind? What do you think the findings of the study were? Did the worth of the findings justify how participants were treated? Why or why not?
2. Consider the “Tea Room Trade” study. Keeping in mind all we have learned about research ethics this week, comment on issues of privacy, confidentiality, and consent as these relate to the study.
3. Contrast the U.S. Public Health Service study in Guatemala with Andrew Wakefield’s study in the U.K. many years later. What are the ethical issues surrounding each study, and are these to do with human subjects or research integrity? Do you view one study as more unethical than the other? Why?
Files:
Watch from minute 18 to 21 (3 minutes total) – just for a sample of Nazi research on prisoners.
https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stor…
Watch Graham Gibbs’ Ethnography Lecture from minute 17-21 (4 minutes total) to learn about the famous “Tearoom Trade” study.
A documentary of the events of the actual Stanford Prison Experiment
They have made a feature film about the events of the Stanford Prison Experiment. View the trailer here!
The investigative journalist who helped expose Andrew Wakefield as a “fraudster” discusses his findings here.